🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives laid to rest in resting places vulnerable to coastal erosion argue that indecision on how best to address the problem is creating unnecessary distress concerning the final resting places of their departed family.

An Impending Threat to Ancient Churchyards

The council have singled out three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being consumed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the issue sets out a range of options, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and relocating them in more secure locations. Authorities maintain it is for local people to determine how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. My parents wanted this to serve as their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Estimates suggest at least part of one churchyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Past

A local business owner recalled a school trip to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the water, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get washed out to the ocean. That is not the case. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go plundering graves in search of treasures. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Peril

Further up the shoreline is situated the burial plot of a ex-soldier who died while serving overseas. His parent said she could not sleep after learning her child's final plot might one day be relocated.

“It truly trouble me to consider this may not remain his permanent home,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant site to visit.”

She believes, new interments should cease but says it is premature to exhume current plots. “My preference for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an timely resolution must be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Searching for Answers and Clarity

An absence of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the challenge has left grieving relatives feeling frustrated and anxious.

Some are calling for additional sea defences to slow the unavoidable loss and to permit funerals to proceed for now. Different voices argue the moment for relocation is approaching.

“It is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And everybody is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager said the graveyards were under the care of the local diocese. “In the end it is up to them to choose the path to take. Our role is here to assist them through that process with residents.”

He added there was ample time to consider all the options. “We are talking decades before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should happen yet. It requires good community discussions to discover the appropriate solutions for each village.”

The possibility of losing the historic sites was described as one of “immense sadness for the area,” but faith leaders also spoke of a doctrine in resurrection, providing a theological perspective on the temporal disappearance of sacred ground.