🔗 Share this article

This is Black History Month in the Britain, and it appears it’s time for a re-evaluation. As time has passed, an observance that started out as a celebration and reminder of the past, cultural identity and bonds between international African diaspora communities, has adopted a business-like atmosphere, growing to encompass functions where Black people are remunerated to address predominantly white listeners about hidden biases and active solidarity. The 2020s Black Lives Matter protests generated a rise in the business of displaying cultural sensitivity. However, that period has concluded. The tide has reached its height, leaving a sort of hollowed out legacy of what increasing understanding is for.

The History of Black History Month

First commemorated in the United States and Canada, Black History Month was established in 1962 as “Negro History Week” by Black scholar Carter G. Woodson with multiple days of remembrance and recognition in the second week of February. Black History Month grew out of this movement and was officially launched in 1970. Currently it is marked not only in the North America in winter, but also in the tenth month in the United Kingdom, the Federal Republic of Germany, Ireland and the Netherlands.

The observance has developed since that time, placing less emphasis on the accounts of transatlantic enslavement and civil rights battles, and more on notable African descendants in public life, creative fields, and advocacy, and extensively acknowledging the input Black people have made to mold society. It is in educational institutions where Black History Month is most regularly observed, with talks and cultural events. But the method the month is observed is a manifestation of the political moment. How it evolves is a valuable example in how appropriation leads to dismantling: the transformation of Black History Month has impeded the purpose of it, which is to address systemic and institutional racism.

---

A Jarring Moment

Hardly anything shows how critical it is to reevaluate Black History Month better than the specific period in which it falls this year. In the United Kingdom, a reemerging right-wing in the form of the Reform party is ahead in surveys. In the summer we witnessed the most significant ultra-conservative gathering in British history. Kemi Badenoch, the African descendant in charge of the right-wing political group, is a staunch adversary of the racial justice movement, and we are in a place where a legislator feels empowered to say that a lack of white people in certain urban areas is a reason for concern. At the same time, far-right parties are surging in the EU as a entirety.

In the America, a colossal assault against inclusion programs and preferential policies has been taken, repeatedly with positive outcomes, to the top legal institutions of the country. A effort to erase the history of people of color and legacy from the archives is ongoing. One of the former president's initial presidential directives focused on the institution dedicated to Black heritage, and the renowned cultural organization, alleging that they of a organized and extensive campaign to change the national past” by depicting the United States “as fundamentally prejudiced”.

Given these circumstances, the month symbolises how little it can be impactful if it is confined to either routine organizational acknowledgments, or stripped of political content commemorations of contributions in the past, rather than challenging the realities of the current era. It also shows how its limited duration means that it is separated from the wider consistent effort that is required. An academic expert, a prof at a learning establishment, put it best when she expressed apprehension about the fleeting superficial actions of the celebration. “The problem with embracing a superficial method”, she commented, “is that it typically leads to that Black History Month becomes a transient display rather than a driver of transformation.”

---

Reconsidering, Not Discarding

Establishing how to adapt, revise and extend actions for racial equality and recognition in such periods of dismay and anxiety is a difficult task. There is a urge to just discontinue events including Black History Month altogether, believing they are inadequate for current needs, or are remnants of an time that has been ineffective.

But despite everything, Black History Month, and in fact the whole broad system and legacy of campaigns for equality – grassroots Black Lives Matter organisations, inclusion and equity efforts, and certainly, even commercial engagements – represent an infrastructure that a considerable labor has gone into. It is there not just to decay as the politics moves on (and in fact, declines), but to be a vital organism.

So what would a fresh vibrant Black History Month appear as? To begin with, it would be not just one concentrated month: something that is spread out throughout the annual calendar (as certain organizations are already beginning to do), sections of its curriculum (particularly around prominent figures of color) incorporated into academic syllabi. It would also be a period that does not avoid governmental matters, and allows opportunity for citizens, particularly young people, to express their concerns and stories. What purpose serves mere awareness of the bygone era when it doesn’t reckon with the present reality of far-right rallies in the street? Organizations who mark it should not be pacified with the neutral terminology of hidden discrimination and awareness of subtle slights, but challenged by the risks that affect everyone if fight against prejudice is not taken seriously. To summarize, Black History Month should be made up-to-date, pressing, and adaptive. Maybe an entire name rebrand is necessary – Contemporary Black History Month.